Refining the process: Safety net dental professionals' experiences with teledentistry implementation during the first year of COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES: Teledentistry helped dentistry adapt to pandemic-era challenges; little is known about dental professionals' teledentistry experiences during this time. This analysis sought to understand professionals' pandemic teledentistry experiences and expectations for the modality's future. METHODS: We conducted virtual individual interviews (n = 21) via Zoom to understand how federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) delivered oral care during the first year of the pandemic, including but not limited to the use of teledentistry. We independently coded each transcript, then identified themes and sub-themes. RESULTS: We identified three major themes: (1) Logistical and equity considerations shaped teledentistry's adoption; (2) Team-based factors influenced implementation; and (3) Teledentistry's future is as-yet undetermined. CONCLUSIONS: Experiences with teledentistry during the first year of COVID-19 varied substantially. Future directions should be more deliberate to counter the urgency of pandemic-style implementation and must address appropriate use, reimbursement guidance, patient and provider challenges, and customizability to each clinic's context.

Implementation of a novel program to support colorectal cancer screening in a community health center consortium before and after the onset of COVID-19: a qualitative study of stakeholders' perspectives.

BACKGROUND: In 2017, the San Francisco Cancer Initiative (SF CAN) established the Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Program to provide technical assistance and financial support to improve CRC screening processes, and outcomes in a consortium of community health centers (CHCs) serving low-income communities in San Francisco. The purpose of this study was twofold: to evaluate the perceived influence of the support provided by the CRC Screening Program's Task Force on CRC screening processes and outcomes in these settings and to identify facilitators and barriers to SF CAN-supported CRC screening activities before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Semi-structured key informant interviews were conducted with consortium leaders, medical directors, quality improvement team members, and clinic screening champions. Interviews were audio-recorded, professionally transcribed, and analyzed for themes. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to develop the interview questions and organize the analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-two participants were interviewed. The most commonly cited facilitators of improved screening processes included the expertise, funding, screening resources, regular follow-up, and sustained engagement with clinic leaders provided by the task force. The most salient barriers identified were patient characteristics, such as housing instability; staffing challenges, such as being understaffed and experiencing high staff turnover; and clinic-level challenges, such as lack of ability to implement and sustain formalized patient navigation strategies, and changes in clinic priorities due to the COVID-19 pandemic and other competing health care priorities. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing CRC screening programs in a consortium of CHCs is inherently challenging. Technical assistance from the Task Force was viewed positively and helped to mitigate challenges both before and during the pandemic. Future research should explore opportunities to increase the robustness of technical assistance offered by groups such as SF CAN to support cancer screening activities in CHCs serving low-income communities.

The Paradoxical Politics of Community Health Centers from the Great Society to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

CONTEXT: Though community health centers (CHCs) arose in the 1960s as part of a Democratic policy push committed to social justice, subsequent support has been shaped by a paradoxical politics wherein Republican and Democratic support for CHCs continually morphed in response to changes in the health policy landscape. METHODS: Drawing on the CHC literature and empirical examples from first-hand accounts and reporting, we explain CHCs' curious historical development from 1965 to present. FINDINGS: Since their inception, CHCs have received differing levels of support due to a paradoxical politics that tell us much about CHC policy history. Though the CHC program began as a Democratic vision, both Republicans and Democrats have calibrated their support for CHCs in response to a broader set of political considerations, from anti-welfare policy commitments to aspirations of establishing a national health care plan. CONCLUSIONS: CHCs have proven to be a politically malleable policy tool within the broader context of American health care policy. While the COVID-19 pandemic raised new questions about CHCs' sustainability and future, CHCs will continue to play a critical role not only providing health care access to underserved populations, but as an attractive bipartisan policy option within the larger framework of U.S. health policy.

Community diagnostic centres: what, where and why?

The British Journal of Healthcare Management's editor discusses the potential benefits of community diagnostic centres for patients and the wider NHS, along with key considerations to drive this model forward.

The Use of Interpreters in Health Centers: A Mixed-Methods Analysis

Health centers serve millions of patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) through highly variable language services programs that reflect patient language preferences, the availability of bilingual staff, and very limited sources of third-party funding for interpreters. We conducted a mixed-methods study to understand interpreter services delivery in federally qualified health centers during 2009–2019. Using the Uniform Data System database, we conducted a quantitative analysis to determine characteristics of centers with and without interpreters, defined as staff whose time is devoted to translation and/or interpreter services. We also analyzed Medicaid-relevant policies' association with health centers' interpreter use. The qualitative component used a sample of 28 health centers to identify interpreter services models. We found that the use of interpreters, as measured by the ratio of interpreter full-time equivalents per patients with LEP, decreased between 2009 and 2019. We did not find statistically significant relationships between interpreter staffing and number of patients with LEP served, or in our examination of Medicaid-relevant policies. Our qualitative analysis uncovered homegrown models with varying program characteristics. Key themes included the critical role of bilingual staff, inconsistent interpreter training, and the reasonably smooth transition to virtual interpretation during COVID-19.

Szűrőbuszok statikus pontként való alkalmazása a Covid-19-járvány idején

Purpose: The aim of our study is to present the results of the mobile sampling of the National Public Health Center during the Covid-19 pandemic, the implementation process of the screening buses of the program "We bring the screening tests in place” as static points, as well as the spatial and temporal frequency of use. Methods: Our retrospective analysis was performed in Pest County between 12th of November, 2020 and 18th of April 2022 by evaluating the Covid-19 sampling results from screening buses (N=164,576). Descriptive statistical methods were used to process the data. Results: In most cases, the screening was carried out in the patient's car, which reduced the risk of infection and ensured the safety and smoothness of the work by moving quickly through the screening point. Sampling was performed using AbottTM, Clintest® and VivaDiagTM rapid tests, and in case of a negative result, another nasopharyngeal sampling was performed for RT-PCR. An average of 504 samples were taken per day, of which on average almost 1⁄3(31.41%) were positive. Conclusion: The advantage of the screening buses was the ability to perform a significant number of tests, their mobility, the fact that they can be placed in easily accessible locations and the reduced risk of infection. Mass testing at static points has proven to be an efficient process that can be used in the future if the need arises. Célkitűzés: Tanulmányunk célja a Covid-19-járvány során a Nemzeti Népegészségügyi Központ mobil mintavételezésének, a „Helybe visszük a szűrővizsgálatokat” program szűrőbuszainak statikus pontként történő megvalósítási folyamatának, illetve területi és időbeni igénybevételi gyakoriságának, eredményeinek bemutatása. Vizsgálat módszere: Retrospektív elemzésünk Budapesten és Pest megyében 2020. november 12. és 2022. április 18. között a szűrőbuszokon végzett Covid-19-mintavételi leleteinek értékelésével valósult meg (N=164 576). A kapott adatok feldolgozásához leíró statisztikai módszereket alkalmaztunk. Eredmények: A teszteléseket legtöbb esetben a páciens személygépjárműjében végeztük el, ami csökkentette az infektálódás kockázatát, illetve a szűrőponton való gyors áthaladás szavatolta a munka biztonságát és gördülékenységét is. A mintavételezések során az AbottTM, a Clintest®, valamint a VivaDiagTM rapid tesztjeit használtuk, negatív eredmény esetén újabb nasopharingealis mintavétel történt RT-PCR elvégzése céljából. Naponta átlagosan 504 mintavétel valósult meg, amelynek átlagosan közel egyharmada (31,41%) mutatott pozitivitást. Következtetések: A szűrőbuszok előnye a nagyszámú tesztek elvégzésének lehetőségében, a mozgathatóságban, a mindenki számára könnyen megközelíthető pontokra való kihelyezésben, valamint a fertőződés kockázatának csökkentésében mutatkozott meg. A tömeges tesztelések statikus pontokon való lebonyolítása hatékonynak bizonyult, amely folyamatot a jövőben is alkalmazhatunk, ha arra szükség lesz.

The Power of Relationships During the Pandemic: A Community Health Center's Response to COVID-19

This report describes one community health center's response to COVID-19 by integrating Pacific Island (PI) values—which prioritize dignity, agency, and ancestral philosophies—within the context of deep relationship building. We share impacts and insights with the hope this work will resonate with other PI and Indigenous communities.

Participation' goals of Community- based organizations in the COVID-19 pandemic based on capacity gaps: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: There have been criticisms that local authorities develop disaster planning independently, which led to less sensitiveness and responsibility of community-based organizations (CBOs). Disasters planning should incorporate into CBOs' management processes. This study aims to set goals of a community-based plan based on preparedness capacities that CBOs need to have in the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study used a prevalidated and reliable questionnaire assessing (CBOs). The tool assesses preparedness in the field of planning, training, and infrastructure. Forty CBOs met the inclusion criteria as assisting or cooperating agencies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Then, key informants, who simultaneously have been working in the health system and CBOs, prioritized low-scale items that have shown capacity gaps according to effects on the vulnerable group, sustainability, and capability of the health system. Descriptive statistics performed using SPSS18 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). RESULTS: The results showed that the preparedness of CBOs was weak in the field of planning, training, and infrastructure. Besides, overlaps of CBOs' resources and covering the clients' medical needs in the COVID-19 pandemic were the most priority that needs to be intervened. CONCLUSION: Providing medical needs by CBOs require legal legitimacy assigned by health authority, especially in epidemic-prone diseases. In addition, assigning a coordinator to set a priority list and mutual agreements authoried by health departments can solve the problem of overlapped resources. Therefore, functional roles of CBOs in the pandemic should focus mostly on resource allocation and the medical needs of clients to set goals and functional objectives.

Impact of COVID-19-related care disruptions on blood pressure management and control in community health centers.

BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled hypertension is a leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease. To ensure continuity of care, community health centers (CHCs) nationwide implemented virtual care (telehealth) during the pandemic. CHCs use the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) 165v8 Controlling High Blood Pressure measure to report blood pressure (BP) control performance. CMS 165v8 specifications state that if no BP is documented during the measurement period, the patient's BP is assumed uncontrolled. METHODS: To examine trends in BP documentation and control rates in CHCs as telehealth use increased during the pandemic compared with pre-pandemic period, we assessed documentation of BP measurement and BP control rates from December 2019 - October 2021 among persons ages 18-85 with a diagnosis of hypertension who had an in-person or telehealth encounter in 11 CHCs. Rates were compared between CHCs that did and did not implement self-measured BP monitoring (SMBP). RESULTS: The percent of patients with hypertension with no documented BP measurement was 0.5% in December 2019 and increased to 15.2% (overall), 25.6% (non-SMBP CHCs), and 11.2% (SMBP CHCs) by October 2021. BP control using CMS 165v8 was 63.5% in December 2019 and decreased to 54.9% (overall), 49.1% (non-SMBP), and 57.2% (SMBP) by October 2021. When assessing BP control only in patients with documented BP measurements, CHCs largely maintained BP control rates (63.8% in December 2019; 64.8% (overall), 66.0% (non-SMBP), and 64.4% (SMBP) by October 2021). CONCLUSIONS: The transition away from in-person to telehealth visits during the pandemic likely increased the number of patients with hypertension lacking a documented BP measurement, subsequently negatively impacting BP control using CMS 165v8. There is an urgent need to enhance the flexibility of virtual care, improve EHR data capture capabilities for patient-generated data, and implement expanded policy and systems-level changes for SMBP, an evidence-based strategy that can build patient trust, increase healthcare engagement, and improve hypertension outcomes.

Federally Qualified Health Center Penetration Associated With Reduced Community COVID-19 Mortality in Four United States Cities.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant impacts on health care access and delivery, with disparate effects across social and racial lines. Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) provide critical primary care services to the nation's most underserved populations, including many communities hardest hit by COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted an ecological analysis that aimed to examine FQHC penetration, COVID-19 mortality, and socio-demographic factors in 4 major United States cities: New York, New York; Chicago, Illinois; Detroit, Michigan; and Seattle, Washington. RESULTS: We found the distribution of COVID-19 cases and mortality varied spatially and in magnitude by city. COVID-19 mortality was significantly higher in communities with higher percentages of low-income residents and higher percentages of racial/ethnic minority residents. FQHC penetration was protective against increased COVID-19 mortality, after model adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Our study underpins the critical role of safety-net health care and policymakers must ensure investment in long-term sustainability of FQHCs, through strategic deployment of capital, workforce development, and reimbursement reform.

Cancer treatment backlog: what's gone wrong and what we need to do to fix it: Nurses in rapid diagnostic centres, one-stop clinics and other services are striving to clear treatment backlogs, but urgent and coordinated action is needed

This time last year it looked like cancer services were back on the road to recovery. The number of people starting treatment was on the rise and had even nudged above pre-pandemic levels.

Development of the nursing associate role in community and primary care settings across England

Why you should read this article: • To understand some of the benefits that the nursing associate role can bring to community and primary care nursing teams • To be aware of the challenges involved in training and embedding nursing associates in community and primary care settings • To recognise the need for clarity on the boundaries and expectations of the nursing associate role in community and primary care settings Nursing associates have been part of the health and social care workforce in England since 2017 and are starting to contribute to managing workforce challenges. However, little is known about the nursing associate role in community and primary care settings. This article provides an overview of what is known about the nursing associate role in community and primary care settings and introduces some emerging findings from recent research. The article identifies some of the benefits that nursing associates can bring to community and primary care nursing teams and some of the challenges involved in training and embedding nursing associates in these sectors of the health and social care workforce.

The preparedness of disaster among nurses in community health centers in rural areas during the COVID-19 pandemic in Malang City.

Positive COVID-19 cases in Malang City, Indonesia continue to increase. Until 04 August 2021, the COVID-19 update shows 3301 positive cases with 7754 cured and 832 deaths. This study aims to identify nurses preparedness in rural area community health centers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Malang for self-control to implement health protocol. This study intends to provide insights on controlling COVID-19 spread in Malang, Indonesia. This research is a quantitative study with correlative analytic observational design and a cross-sectional approach involving 120 nurses from 16 primary health centers. The results of the bivariate analysis using gamma correlation test are: knowledge factors (p = 0.005; r = 0.35), attitude (p = 0.000; r = 0.46), means of infrastructure (p = 0.000; r = 0.54), and self-control (p = 0.000; r = 0.52) for the quarantined COVID-19 patients. Knowledge, attitude, infrastructure, and safe house factors can influence self-control for COVID-19. In rural areas, health education-as education and empowerment for patient self-control-is an effort to encourage them to obey health protocol during the pandemic. Nurse readiness and preparedness during the pandemic is crucial for strengthening the assertive behavior commitment through self-control. This ensures the community's awareness of the importance of complying with health protocols for the common good. Mental nursing intervention needs to be added as a part of psychosocial therapy for the community's social problems, primarily in reducing the pressure due to the social distancing enforcement to control and prevent COVID-19 spread.

Association between state payment parity policies and telehealth usage at community health centers during COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: We study the association between payment parity policies and telehealth utilization at community health centers (CHCs) before, during, and after the onset of the pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We use aggregated, de-identified data from FAIR Health for privately insured patients at CHC sites. Descriptive statistics and time trends are calculated. Logistic regression models were used to quantify the factors associated with telehealth utilization for each of our time periods: 1) pre-pandemic (March-June 2019), 2) immediate pandemic response (March-June 2020), and 3) sustained pandemic response (March-June 2021). RESULTS: Telehealth usage rates at CHC sites surged to approximately 61% in April 2020. By April 2021, only 29% of CHC sites in states without payment parity policies used telehealth versus 42% in states without. Controlling for other characteristics, we find that CHC sites in states with payment parity were more likely to utilize telehealth one year after the onset of the pandemic (OR:1.740, p<0.001) than states without, but did not find this association in 2019 or 2020. DISCUSSION: The public health emergency drove widespread use of telehealth, making the virtual care environment inherently different in 2021 than in 2019. Due to the unique fiscal constraints facing CHCs, the financial sustainability of telehealth may be highly relevant to the relationship between telehealth utilization and payment parity we find in this paper. CONCLUSION: Supportive payment policy and continued investments in broadband availability in rural and undeserved communities should enable CHCs to offer telehealth services to populations in these areas.

Beyond Primary Care: Renewing the Community Health Center

United States community health centers address socioeconomic and environmental conditions and provide comprehensive primary care despite market forces that reinforce a medical model. Collaborating with 14 health center organizations, the RCHN Commu-nity Health Foundation promoted the original and broader health center vision of health, launching its population health management initiative in 2015. Although participating organizations were recognized as patient-centered medical homes and achieved rewards for quality, most identified gaps in their capacity for population health management. These challenges, addressed through peer learning and local initiatives, included engaging target populations, care coordination, socioeconomic and clinical data collection, and working with nontraditional local organizations. With relatively small funding, the zeal and enthusiasm for population health was revitalized among health center stall. The current pandemic and growing national concern for health disparities represents an opportunity to expand this broader vision of population health and to sustain it as the COVID-19 pandemic eventu-ally subsides.

Implementing expanded COVID-19 testing in Massachusetts community health centers through community partnerships: Protocol for an interrupted time series and stepped wedge study design.

BACKGROUND: Community Health Centers (CHCs) are a critical source of care for low-income and non-privately insured populations. During the pandemic, CHCs have leveraged their infrastructure and role as a trusted source of care to engage the communities they serve in COVID-19 testing. METHODS: To directly address the impact that COVID-19 has had on historically marginalized populations in Massachusetts, we designed a study of community-engaged COVID-19 testing expansion: (1) leveraging existing partnerships to accelerate COVID-19 testing and rapidly disseminate effective implementation strategies; (2) incorporating efforts to address key barriers to testing participation in communities at increased risk for COVID-19; (3) further developing partnerships between communities and CHCs to address testing access and disparities; (4) grounding the study in the development of a shared ethical framework for advancing equity in situations of scarcity; and (5) developing mechanisms for communication and science translation to support community outreach. We use a controlled interrupted time series design, comparing number of COVID-19 tests overall and among people identified as members of high-risk groups served by intervention CHCs compared with six matched control CHCs in Massachusetts, followed by a stepped wedge design to pilot test strategies for tailored outreach by CHCs. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we describe a community-partnered strategy to accelerate COVID-19 testing in historically marginalized populations that provides ongoing resources to CHCs for addressing testing needs in their communities. The study aligns with principles of community-engaged research including shared leadership, adequate resources for community partners, and the flexibility to respond to changing needs over time.

Addressing COVID-19 Testing Inequities Among Underserved Populations in Massachusetts: A Rapid Qualitative Exploration of Health Center Staff, Partner, and Resident Perceptions.

Introduction: Access to COVID-19 testing has been inequitable and misaligned with community need. However, community health centers have played a critical role in addressing the COVID-19 testing needs of historically disadvantaged communities. The aim of this paper is to explore the perceptions of COVID-19 testing barriers in six Massachusetts communities that are predominantly low income and describe how these findings were used to build tailored clinical-community strategies to addressing testing inequities. Methods: Between November 2020 and February 2021, we conducted 84 semi-structured qualitative interviews with 107 community health center staff, community partners, and residents. Resident interviews were conducted in English, Spanish, Vietnamese, and Arabic. We used a 2-phase framework analysis to analyze the data, including deductive coding to facilitate rapid analysis for action and an in-depth thematic analysis applying the Social Ecological Model. Results: Through the rapid needs assessment, we developed cross-site suggestions to improve testing implementation and communications, as well as community-specific recommendations (e.g., locations for mobile testing sites and local communication channels). Upstream barriers identified in the thematic analysis included accessibility of state-run testing sites, weak social safety nets, and lack of testing supplies and staffing that contributed to long wait times. These factors hindered residents' abilities to get tested, which was further exacerbated by individual fears surrounding the testing process and limited knowledge on testing availability. Discussion: Our rapid, qualitative approach created the foundation for implementing strategies that reached underserved populations at the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in winter 2021. We explored perceptions of testing barriers and created actionable summaries within 1-2 months of data collection. Partnering community health centers in Massachusetts were able to use these data to respond to the local needs of each community. This study underscores the substantial impact of upstream, structural disparities on the individual experience of COVID-19 and demonstrates the utility of shifting from a typical years' long research translation process to a rapid approach of using data for action.

The Roles of Community Health Nurses' in Covid-19 Management in Indonesia: A Qualitative Study.

Background: The majority of Covid-19 cases occur at the community level requiring health services to be available at the primary health care level, which also includes Community Health Nursing (CHN) services. It is important to understand various perspectives of the parties involved, effective solutions, and strategies used by nurses in managing Covid-19 in order to be able to provide these services. The purpose of this study was to explore the community health nurses' (CHNs) roles in the Covid-19 management in Indonesia. Methods: A qualitative method was used to explore the perspective from nurses and health cadres as participants. Data were collected through in-depth phone interviews with 11 participants from December 2020 to February 2021 in Bandung. Data were analyzed manually using thematic analysis. Results: Five themes were extracted in this study, namely providing comprehensive services by CHNs; utilizing technology to bridge the information needs; implementing family nursing care; spreading the wings of health cadres by CHNs; and collaborating as the heart of Covid-19 prevention and management. Conclusion: CHNs should employ health education, empowerment strategies, group processes, and advocacy in adapting to the Covid-19 pandemic situation. The five themes identified in this study can be used by policy makers to develop strategies in optimizing the CHN in Covid-19 pandemic management and the possible challenges of future global pandemics.

Project COALESCE-An Example of Academic Institutions as Conveners of Community-Clinic Partnerships to Improve Cancer Screening Access.

In Virginia, 56% of colorectal cancers (CRC) are diagnosed late, making it one of three enduring CRC mortality hotspots in the US. Cervical cancer (CCa) exhibits a similar pattern, with 48% late-stage diagnosis. Mortality for these cancers is worse for non-Latinx/e(nL)-Black people relative to nL-White people in Virginia, but preventable with equitable screening access and timely diagnostic follow-up. However, structural barriers, such as fractured referral systems and extended time between medical visits, remain. Because Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) care for a large proportion of racial and ethnic minorities, and underserved communities, regardless of ability to pay, they are ideal partners to tackle structural barriers to cancer screenings. We piloted a quality improvement initiative at five FQHCs in southcentral Virginia to identify and address structural, race-related barriers to CRC, as well as CCa screening and diagnostic follow-up using evidence-based approaches. Uniquely, FQHCs were paired with local community organizations in a didactic partnership, to elevate the community's voice while together, increase support, acceptance, uptake, and intervention sustainability. We report on project development, and share preliminary data within the context of project goals, namely, to increase cancer screenings by 5-10%, improve knowledge and diagnostic follow-up processes, and build longitudinal partnerships.

Social Determinants and COVID-19 in a Community Health Center Cohort.

Associations between social determinants of health (SDOH), demographic factors including preferred language, and SARS-CoV-2 detection are not clear. We conducted a retrospective cohort study among those seeking testing for SARS-CoV-2 at a multi-site, urban community health center. Logistic regression and exact matching methods were used to identify independent predictors of SARS-CoV-2 detection among demographic, SDOH, and neighborhood-level variables. Of 1,361 included individuals, SARS-CoV-2 was detected among 266 (19.5%). Logistic regression demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 detection was less likely in White participants relative to Hispanic participants (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.46). and more likely in patients who prefer Spanish relative to those that prefer English (aOR 2.04, 95% CI 1.43-2.96). No observed SDOH predicted SARS-CoV-2 detection in adjusted models. A robustness analysis using a matched subset of the study sample produced findings similar to those in the main analysis. Preferring to receive care in Spanish is an independent predictor of SARS-CoV-2 detection in a community health center cohort.